Goal: Understand what makes Solana especially strong for low-fee, high-throughput apps—and how it compares to other L1s. Cover: Public‑key crypto (ed25519), Proof of History “clock,” Tower BFT, Sealevel parallel runtime, fees & local fee markets; quick contrasts with Ethereum, Avalanche, NEAR. Activity: Fill a one‑page “chain speed & finality” comparison and walk through one Solana vs one Ethereum transaction on explorers. Takeaway: “I can explain—clearly—why Solana’s design gives sub‑second block cadence, parallel execution, and ultra‑low fees for most use cases.”


1) Module overview

Solana’s edge comes from a tight pipeline: cryptographic signatures prove control → Proof of History (PoH) orders events like a global clock → Tower BFT finalizes with stake‑weighted voting → the Sealevel runtime executes many non‑conflicting transactions in parallel → a base fee + priority fee model (with local fee markets) keeps costs low and isolates congestion. For building consumer dApps or running active communities, that means fast UX at tiny cost, even during busy periods.


2) Core talking points

Keys & signatures (Solana specifics)

Ordering with a cryptographic clock (PoH)

Voting & finality (Tower BFT)

Parallel execution (Sealevel)

Fees & local fee markets

Timing realities